Arsenal Banter Archive February 11 2019

 

Use our rumours form to send us arsenal transfer rumours.

11 Feb 2019 19:20:30
Well, if Rambo's deal is true. Why would any decent player not at a top 2 club ( good chance of silverware ) contemplate signing on for their existing club. Rambo's deal only makes sense if you get him for free. Therefore, any decent player at a club outside of City and Pool in the EPL would be stupid not to follow the Rambo approach! So the clubs with the most won't loose their players for free - ironic!

I know it's not as simple as this but the future looks grey for the non-elite clubs.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

11 Feb 2019 19:51:35
Make sure your players have two years on thier contract at all times is the answer surely to stop them running down thier contract.
If you give a player a 5 year contract and at the end of year 3 he won't extend then sell taking away his ability to run down his contract and leave for free 2 years later.
Arsenal have managed contracts very very poorly in Just about every way you can imagine hence we keep losing players for nothing or having to give them outrageous wages not to leave for free.

Agree3 Disagree2

11 Feb 2019 20:35:53
So we end up selling our best players?

Don’t players need to agree to be sold and to whom - the Risk before was being out of contract. Now it can be a benefit.

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Feb 2019 20:52:00
It's not ideal but it's better than nothing, quite literally in our case.
Yes of course players need to agree to be sold and too who they are sold to which is right and proper but the clubs need to take back the power from the players and the only way I can think of is when you get down to Just 2 years remaining give the players 3 choices
1 extend on reasonable terms
2 leave for club of your choosing if they match our valuation
3 run down your contract training alone away from the rest of hhe squad with absolutely no chance of playing for 2 years.
Would Juventus give 400k a week to a player who hadn't kicked a ball competently for 2 years? Would Wales cap a player who who hadn't player for 2 years?
Arsenal players have been holding the club to ransom and only by getting tough will the club regain control of the situation. Liverpool seem to sell before it comes to this as do other clubs so it's not impossible for us to do the same.
we need to stop it because the players obviously won't do it for themselves because it hurts them financially.

Agree1 Disagree1

11 Feb 2019 21:27:29
I understand the logic 62, and have seen others say similar, but if you sign a 5 year contract as an IT person, andyoir employer thinks you're really good at your job, then in year 3 try to get you to sign an extension and you say that you would like to stick to the contract both parties agreed to and they then send you to work in the cellar using Word Perfect on an old PC with 5.25 inch floppy discs and can no longer interact with your work colleagues, would that seem reasonable to anyone except the employer? I wonder if there's even some kind of constructive dismissal case?

There's nothing stopping either party suggesting a longer or shorter contract, with the associated risks. Other clauses could be added too.

I baulk at the money in football, but don't think a footballer should be treated badly by a club unless they weren't upholding the terms of their contract. Maybe longer term contracts with wage reviews or performance clauses etc. but I don't think punishing players will have the desired outcome and would probably put players off joining such a Draconian club?

Agree0 Disagree1

11 Feb 2019 21:48:11
Football has become every man and club for themselves Jim and every penny that is demanded from both has to come from somewhere mate.
Arsenal have lost out financially again to a player who gets a fantastic deal beyond there true ability but the fans will Want the club to spend despite no fee coming in, so where do Arsenal get thier money from for the replacement?
The fans is my guess.

Agree1 Disagree1

11 Feb 2019 22:59:11
The biggest issue is - we aren’t competing. If you compete, you keep. Look at City with KDB.

Fans need to revolt - sky and stadium goers to really make an impact but it won’t happen.

In theory you make sense 62 but not in reality - could we afford to never t play Rambo, Ozil and Sanchez all at th3 same time and put into the reserves. FFP would really kick in, would sponsors be upset and players sign for us.

If we are run of the mill then we will have run of the mill players or make stars to see them leave like other clubs across Europe.

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Feb 2019 23:34:28
Other clubs don't have players running down contracts as often as we do SY mate so there must be a different way that actually works.
Who was the last big name to leave Liverpool or Spurs for free?
They sold Bale Suarez and Courtinho for big bucks while we got held to ransom and look at them and us now?
How do Spurs keep Kane on a fraction of what we pay Ozil or Ramsey wanted from us?
This is a problem we've allowed to get out of control.

Agree2 Disagree1

11 Feb 2019 20:03:37
More fools juve, that's what i say. I doubt he will pay his way with value. that's if he manages to improve his availability.

Agree1 Disagree1

11 Feb 2019 22:43:12
Perhaps, but most people I deal with seem pretty mercenary about their own jobs, so why do footballers have to be overly honorable?

Ultimately, workers in any form have only their skills and labour to earn their money, and if the rest of the world tries to earn as much as possible, why shouldn't a footballer? Especially if it's just the board or owner who will benefit from any savings. If they do their best and don't break the terms of their contract, to me it doesn't seem right to punish them. Why does it matter that Ramsey has got a good deal for himself? Most fans wanted him gone years ago and AW brought him back in despite criticism. He then had some great performances and some poorer ones, but he always worked hard and won us some matches. He's not been given the chance in his primary role as ozils there, but even now without Ozil He's not played in the hole. He's stuck to his contract. If he can get loads more money elsewhere, why should he stay? If someone chooses to stay when they could go elsewhere (like Kane) they should be applauded.

A contract is a commitment and risk for both parties. Carroll got a 7 year deal at West ham didn't he? Perhaps clubs need to re-evaluate their youth setups, who they choose to play and why, and contracts. At the same time, fans should maybe decide if they want more superstar players and demand to always be challenging to win, or whether they want something more sustainable and honourable despite lack of success. AW gave us the latter and the fans said money and success was more important. His approach was part of the reason I was willing to overlook so much else, as I value the approach more than results and thought that it was possible to make tweaked to bring succrss. But in future, every now and again you might get a Porch or AW that gets players and fans buy in and brings success in an honourable way all round, but i think the short-term success/ money approach seems generally more likely.

Agree0 Disagree0

12 Feb 2019 06:48:31
62,- I think Kane likes being King and would love to make history at Spurs. He has another contract in him and won’t be there if they don’t compete for the title. They keep competing so he stays and is king.
Liverpool are run better than us from that position but are competing and on the way up.

Agree0 Disagree0

12 Feb 2019 08:18:30
That's fine Jim as long as you remember the money has to come from somewhere in order to pay someone far too much you have to pay someone else far too little, there's the way of the world mate.
If we think that having multi billionaires is great then we also have to think poverty for others is great too.
It's simple mathematics that the cake is only so big and the only choice is how you divide it,
Aaron's walking away for free will have a negative impact at Arsenal somewhere Whether it's on youth investment or ground staff or asking the fans to pay more the money lost simply has to impact elsewhere. it would be lovely if everyone was a billionaire and no one went without but that isn't reality unfortunately.

Agree0 Disagree1

12 Feb 2019 09:55:09
The fact is SY we have ran our business very poorly while others have ran there business much more sensibly with much more foresight.
People used to talk about what great shape Arsene would leave us in but in truth that's not what's happend.

Agree0 Disagree0

12 Feb 2019 10:13:24
Good luck to Ramsey at Juventus and on getting an amazing salary.
Post David Dein, Gazidis and Wenger handled contracts terribly and hence where we are now. Raul Sanllehi recently confirmed that signings usually get an initial 5 year deal and as soon as that runs down a couple of seasons decision have to be made and contracts can no longer be allowed to run down.
These huge salaries, such as Ramsey's, can cause problems as other other players at a club want parity. Imagine what Ramsey thought knowing that Ozil had secured a £350,000 a week deal. I know these salaries are often paid as there no transfer fee involved, but that is soon forgotten when players are playing for the same team on the same pitch.

Agree0 Disagree2

12 Feb 2019 11:08:51
Aaron Ramsey is an individual who has done the best for himself but let's not forget that had he stayed at Arsenal on his current wages for the rest of his career he certainly wouldn't have ended up penniless.
5 million a year at Arsenal which after tax is 3 million a year take home so with a career that started at 18 and will probably end at 34 years old Aaron would have left the game with around 20 millions in the bank even had he stayed at Arsenal.
If he is lucky enough to live another 80 years after he retires he would have been left with £5000 a week to live on for the rest of his life, that's not allowing for interest over those possible 80 years either.
Now he's joined Juventus he will probably be left with 40 million to retire on so £10,000 a week for life after he's finish playing.
£5000 a week or 10,000 a week every single week for the rest of your life, is there a difference in reality? Can you spend 5k a week ever single week, week in week out for 80 years? What will Aaron be able to do when he retires from Juventus that he wouldn't be able to do had he stayed at Arsenal?
Once your financially secure for life surely one of the greatest gifts is choice to do what you really want to do apposed to what most people have to do even if they hate it in order to put a roof over their head and feed their families.
Aaron like Mesut Sanchez Theo and others did not have to hold Arsenal to ransom out of necessity they all did it through personal choice and those left behind the fans the staff everyone will have to pay for these players personal choices, it's just worth remembering when congratulating Aaron that somebody or lots and lots of people somewhere has to lose out to unable him to achieve this extra good fortune.

One man's greed is another man's going without, that's how it works.

Agree0 Disagree0

12 Feb 2019 11:27:38
I agree 61.
And 62, don't get me wrong. Honestly, I would rather we tried our home grown players or younger buys like Gnabry, Holding, AMN, Nelson etc and have a wage cap that went up on line with inflation or something, but I'm happy seeing how we compete like tha and the challenge of trying to make things work like that. That's why I supported Wenger's approach, but Others want trophies and that will cost money. As you say, it costs the fans money. But you can't have it every way and demand competitive clubs that look to buy star players rather than develop their own, then expect players to - the commodities - to be blindly loyal and ignore what's going on around them, when in the case of Ozil, Ramsey, giroud got so much stick from their own fans.

Agree0 Disagree0

12 Feb 2019 11:53:39
Hi Jim to me it's like playing cards you got to know when to stick or twist.
Kos will walk away from the game very financially secure but much less wealthy than he could have done had he not been so loyal to Arsenal
While Theo will retire from the game much wealthier than Kos while only ever being half the player because he held the club to ransom everytime his contract got close to running out.
I think like all other walks of life you've got to know and accept who you are dealing with on an individual basis.
Once you see the £ signs in a players eyes rather than passion let go for as much you can get because those who still have passion for you will want what's best for you and them equally and won't hold you to ransom, if a player sees only what's good for him then he will eventually act on that without a second thought for you. Jack Theo the list is endless of average players doing well out of but not for Arsenal hence we are where we are now.
I'm not against people doing well for themselves at all but I don't like out and out greedy and totally selfish people very much personally.
Vincent Kompany? Now I like him a lot as a person.

Agree0 Disagree0

12 Feb 2019 12:38:24
united seem to have 1 year extention options as standard which seems a really good policy, i don't know why we don't add those. spurs seem to renew contracts much earlier if players are really performing, kane signed his last extention with still 4 years to run to take it to 6 with a fair sized increase he would be mad not to take it, but the club also keep maximum control over him and the increases can be less if they are more regular and keeps morale high if you're getting pay rises because you're performing well, not just because your contracts ending and they don't want you to go for free.

Agree0 Disagree0

12 Feb 2019 13:18:05
The United method makes sense to me Eden and once a player doesn't want to extend then accept his decision as if he was working his 2 year notice and listen to sensible offers but clubs have to make a player running down his contract much much less desirable than compromising and Woking out a solution that is mutually beneficial to club and player alike.
I don't like the idea of players being forced to stay where they are not happy but neither do I like the idea any club but especially Arsenal being held to ransom.
I wish Aaron Ramsey the best even though I dislike the way he has manipulated the situation to his own ends he is only 50% to blame by for taking advantage of a poorly run club that's is equally 50% to blame for for its own misfortune.

Agree0 Disagree0

12 Feb 2019 22:54:53
62 - are they being held to ransom? A player has a finite contract with risk once out of contract eg injury etc. If his market value is 400k per week due to the money in the game and can secure his family’s financial future for the next generation - then why should he not do it? Rambo has a young son. Why shouldn’t he want to secure the best future for him etc?

If I could secure my kids a great future - is my loyalty to my family or my employers?

What would you do

Me - family wins.

Agree0 Disagree0

13 Feb 2019 09:19:05
Nothing wrong at all with looking after your self and your family SY of course everyone wants that but it's about how much you value yourself and your family above every one and anything else that's important in my opinion.
Is it OK to move your money abroad to a tax haven in an attempt to avoid funding the NHS because that's good for you and yours but to call on the emergency services should you need them?
Aaron and his family would hardly have gone short in the future had he signed a new contract at his current wages and shown loyalty to a club that has supported him through his many injuries or had he signed a one year extention but left the club that has been extremely good to him with a transfer fee and himself with a mere 200k rather than 400k a week between now and retirement.
Should he bring up his children to think it's all about them and nothing and no one else matters and that it's fine to milk anyone and everyone you can for as much as you can regardless of how good people have been to you in the past?
It's all about price SY mate and if we all want more than our fair share then someone somewhere has to pay the price for us having too much.
Arsenal won't receive any fee for Aaron so we won't be able to replace him unless we find the money elsewhere and while what's good for Aaron and Juventus it will inevitably be bad for Arsenal fans in one way shape or form.
We should all aim to be comfortable in life and for niether ourselves or our children to have to struggle but for me personally I think Gordon gecko ( or whatever the character was called) was very wrong and greed isn't a good thing at all.

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Feb 2019 19:13:04
Hats Off To Aaron £400,000 A Week!

Believable0 Unbelievable0

11 Feb 2019 21:13:43
Between Ramsey and Ozil that's 37 million a year going out of the game that will never come back into the game, most clubs who get fees reinvest in new players so the money circulates when players get all the money that money is lost to the game forever and eventually hurts the game long term.

Agree1 Disagree0

11 Feb 2019 20:23:56
In the words of Sir Bruce, didn't he do well.

Agree0 Disagree0

And Finally... Excuses!

11 Feb 2019 12:08:37
{Ed's Note - Ed001 has posted a new article entitled, And Finally... Excuses!

Believable0 Unbelievable0

11 Feb 2019 21:17:11
Brilliant! 😂😂.

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Feb 2019 11:46:00
I'm so surprised there is so much negativity towards Emery from some on here. Emery has been given no time at all. I'm of the belief that any manager needs much longer than they are normally given to show whether they're good enough, unless they're losing almost every game which we are not. Pep, Klopp (4 years still not won anything) were not instant successes and given time have proven themselves. Emery deserves the same especially with the squad he has inherited.
He has a proven track record throughout his career winning various high level competitions and accolades. Steve quoted a while ago "Three times europa league winner, french treble winner, 8 major trophy winner, three times promoted in his early days with clubs who had never been promoted, european coach of the year".
He has only been able to make 5 signings with limited funds (now a 6th with Suarez - too early to say anything) :
- A keeper mainly for the future who seems alright but was never going to have a huge impact to the overall team performance.
- 2 veteran defenders on a free just to give us any sense of depth at the back - again was never going to be able to improve us much.
- 2 young midfielders who will need time and have needed time to properly improve and implement themselves into an Arsenal system.
That's all he was able to do to improve the piece of **** squad he was left with.
He was given a team with two strikers (both having not been at the club for long) and a creative midfielder who shows up 1 game in every 4 and that's it.
How was he supposed to make huge improvements to our previous season?

He has brought what personally seems like a more structured system, with the willingness to change tactics when they are going wrong - and that is all we could have asked for this season. Defensively (unless we play unattractive football) we were always going to be as bad.

Believable3 Unbelievable2

{Ed001's Note - 8 trophies - 3 no one wants (Europa Leagues) and 3 with PSG in a league with no competition. So actually he has only really won 2 and he has never proven able to succeed in handling big egos.}

11 Feb 2019 12:21:23
I swear that always happens on this site. That's not the important part and was just one reason why maybe he should be more respected. Also nullifying achievements that are still achievements. It's not like Europa never has difficult teams to beat. And they were unlucky in the champs league.

And That's missing the main point I was trying to make. He hasn't had a chance to really improve the squad. He hasn't been given enough time and deserves more. He hasn't really done a lot wrong with a squad that I don't think anyone could have got much better out of.

Agree1 Disagree1

{Ed001's Note - really? So he couldn't have organised a defensive system by now? People like you are making excuses for his failings. There is absolutely no improvement in the defence, despite the addition of something Wenger lacked - a defensive midfielder. Yet still Emery's defence is even worse than when he took over. How is that not his fault?}

11 Feb 2019 12:51:32
No one is calling for Emery head and I think most accept he must be given the minimum 2 years but what people are saying is they are most certainly not impressed with what they are or have seen so far.
People shocked and disappointed in is his total lack of in organising our defence any better than Arsene did, we are every bit as poor at the back and in defensive midfield as ever but not solely because of the players we havd but because of the total lack of coaching and organising us into some kind of effective unit that understands what they are supposed to be doing.
This was Arsenes biggest weakness and it looks like it's Dicks too so far.
Forget about the players we do or don't have and just show me the defensive game plan that we've lacked for years because only with a decent game plan organisation and discipline will buying new players make any difference at all.

Agree1 Disagree5

11 Feb 2019 13:03:37
I completely agree we had hoped for much, much more at the back. I’m not excusing his shortcomings obviously we should have had more defensive improvement and that hasn’t come. It’s the bigger picture stuff that I’m trying to get at. This is the best top 6 in years and we are still massively in contention for 4th – which is what everyone expected at the start of the season!

One player can make a huge difference as well. Van Dijk is the example everyone uses because it’s just true. He has improved a defence that was initially pretty poor.

And what’s wrong with making excuses for his failings when there are legitimate justifications to be given. I’m not trying to come off as antagonistic, I know no one is calling for his head. Really all I’m doing is offering up another opinion and the other side of the argument. Especially when a manager I still believe can build something given more time is getting so much ****.

He’s still got a long way to go of course and yeah it is super annoying we still are just a 4 sieves and a drain at the back.

Agree2 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - you are right one player can make a difference, and you have that player in Torreira, so why is it not working?}

11 Feb 2019 13:36:29
I think what most people are saying Henry is " Dick you've got 2 seasons and we want expect need to see a lot lot more from your defence for us to Want you here for much much longer than 2 years "
But it's 2 years and if you can't make us more effective than our last manager could then thanks for your efforts but we need to find a man that can.
All the fans are doing now is letting Dick know where he stands and that the days of Arsenal being 4th place content are most definitely over.
United Chelsea City Liverpool Spurs fans all want and expect their clubs to compete and challenge for titles at least why is it unreasonable for Arsenal fans to want some of that too?
We will never have it without a defence so the expectation of Dick is to build one that is effective in 2 seasons and it's not all about money it's about ability to build organise and motivation much more than simply Just spending money.

Agree0 Disagree3

{Ed002's Note - It is three seasons.}

11 Feb 2019 13:44:54
just an opinion. but considering emery prefers to play out from the back, would he not need great CB's for that?

with the current lot, the most stable i saw our defense was during the Chelsea game. bell, kos, pappa, kola. those 4 together had a great game till bells injury. so i don't think that emery is incapable of setting up a good defense, just that he does not have the personnel. the second mustaphi comes into the fray, we are done for. takes too much time on the ball. personally i think he has an IQ that matches a donkey. gets caught out by players from teams like Huddersfield. with bell and pappa injured, along with monreal being too old and injury prone, we are going to need to revamp this whole back 4. but between the back 4 at chelsea i saw hope, only with my hope to die with bells injury and not soon after papp's at united. again mustaphi came on and ruined the game!

since i've watched football, all great teams who have achieved greatness have one thing in common, a very good defense. a solid defense gives your offensive players the confidence and opportunities to play to their strengths. so in short i don't think Dick has done an amazing job or even a good job. but we need to give him time to reshuffle the back line and hopefully sign some wingers. COYG!

Agree3 Disagree0

11 Feb 2019 13:59:07
I thought it was 2 years with a 3rd year if both parties were happy Ed002?

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - No, I have explained this - it is 3 years with a two year break point.}

11 Feb 2019 15:07:50
Its harsh to solely blame Emery for our defensive performances this season. Anyone can see that there is no clear improvement in our defense based on both what you see unfold on the pitch and the amount of goals we have conceded. Yes I would've thought Emery would've implemented a better defensive strategy to reduce our goals conceded, but some of the goals are clearly individual errors that he has no control over unless he replaces the player in defence! Also it needs to be noted that a solid defence requires not only good defenders (which we clearly lack in Mustafi, Licht, Kosc and nacho will inevitably decline, AMN not a natural RB etc) but a great understanding between the GK, back 4/ 5, and DM - but this cannot achieved if the defence is constantly rotating and changing each game due to a torrid injury list. Give Emery the summer and next season (hopefully with a fully fit defence) before you judge his defensive tactics/ organisation.

Agree1 Disagree0

11 Feb 2019 14:58:40
What exactly does 3 years with a 2 year break point mean Ed? is it not the same thing as 2 years with an optional 3rd season if both parties are happy to continue?
Sorry to be thick but I don't understand the difference between the two :- (.

Agree0 Disagree1

{Ed002's Note - No, it is a three year contract and after two years the parties could part ways - it is totally different. There is a reason for doing it that way.}

11 Feb 2019 16:03:50
I see your point CB but like you say about yourself, you would have thought Emery would have implemented a better defensive strategy to stop us conceding as easily as always.
The question is can he? Does he have the knowledge and ability to do what we need most?
We can't expect to continue to be easy pickings at the back and see improvement on our effectiveness to compete, the two Just aren't compatible.
We are a big club like Spurs United Liverpool City Chelsea are and we shouldn't just keep hoping 2 of those 5 have a bad season and let us in the champions league by snatching 4th place we should be competing with them as equals and we will never do that unless we tighten up at the back with a better strategy for doing so.
Being difficult to score against has to be where you start rebuilding surely.

Agree2 Disagree4

11 Feb 2019 16:10:21
Emery took over one of the weakest Arsenal squads I can recall, a team in decline under Wenger, having failed to qualify for the CL 2 seasons running. Other than Lichtsteiner, the signings made have been decent and we are currently 4th in a very competitive top 6.
Defensively we have improved from set pieces. The defence has suffered 2 season ending injuries, as well as injuries to all the defenders.
Of the teams in the top 6, Klopp has been in charge since 2015 and hasn't won a thing at Liverpool. Pochettino has been at the Toot since 2014 and hasn't won a thing. Guardiola has been at Man City since 2016 and the club has spent hugely to assemble the current squad, which has won 2 trophies during his time at the club. Chelsea and Man U have new managers this season, with Sarri under enormous pressure and United sacked Mourinho. So it is far from easy at the top of the PL. Emery needs time to reform the squad and he needs our support while he does it. With the players and funds available at the club, I am not sure any other manager could have done any better.

Agree4 Disagree5

11 Feb 2019 17:10:50
Ive got to say, from what i have seen, Chelsea, us and even the newly rejuvenated united, have had problems and still don't look too solid. I wouldn't trust any of the defences of those three at all. that's probably why at the moment all three teams are fighting for fourth. Spuds were mightily lucky at home to Leicester the other day and looked very shakey. The top two teams in the league have had settled managers and both started with shakey defences but bit by bit and season by season put it right. Nobody sorts it in a few months.

Agree1 Disagree0

11 Feb 2019 19:56:13
Equally Steve no one sorts it out without doing something to sort it, Dick is sticking to the Arsene method of ignore it and hope it just happens by magic all on its own.

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Feb 2019 20:49:33
Emery had T. Sliva, Marquinhos as CB at PSG and managed to ship in 6 goals 3 of them came in the last 5 mins after having 4 goals lead against barca, I think that says a lot about his defensive strategies and tactics.
He won the french league with neymar, cavani and Mbappe and his midfield and CB are some of the best in the world but buffled against top teams in the CL again.
You go to play city at home you set up your defence tight and get your tactics spot on, at least when we conceded the first goal he could recognise the weak link and shouted orders but to concede 3 identical goals is pretty shyt.

Agree1 Disagree0

11 Feb 2019 20:58:09
RG we are 5th mate and we need to stop with this worst arsenal team and all this crap. We have talent at the club, arsene didn’t know how you use them and now Emery also making mistakes. Ranieri took over a team was about to get relegated, he tightened up his defence and won the league with them, you hire a manager for a reason.

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Feb 2019 23:08:34
Moe, a very true statement. We need to raise our standards, make our concerns be heard and get behind the team and manager. We cannot let anyone think that we are happy playing this boring plodding football with no creativity in th3 team while still can’t bloody defend. This is way below my expectations - forget league position but just how Arsenal should play. That’s what’s important to me. Trophies will come. A disastrous winter window has put Emery back a little so I expect huge changes on and off the pitch in the Summer. If the manager can’t see that and make changes then he’s time is up. Just as W3nger’s time was up. No manager should outstay their welcome especially if they haven’t earned it. Hopefully Emery has a plan, just had a slow execution.

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Feb 2019 20:07:08
Gunner, that is something i don't agree on at all. On the contrary, wether he is getting improvement or not, within his limits and constraints, he is actually trying all sorts. that's something you can't throw at him.

Agree0 Disagree0

12 Feb 2019 06:44:50
perhaps he sticks to coaching the defence and drilling them? Then stick with a formation and team for more than 1 away game. A simple 3 at the back to protect the goal and stop us getting exposed by our stacking fullbacks?

Agree0 Disagree0

12 Feb 2019 08:33:25
What's he doing differently to Arsene to stop goals Steve?
4 at the back 3 at the back at Arsene like Dick toyed with both without success, yet other teams make either system work for them pretty well.
Leicester city are the prime example of not having the best individual players but somehow producing the best defence in thier title winning season, it's not always about what you have but what you get out of it mate.

Agree1 Disagree0

12 Feb 2019 11:10:05
I don't get it when someone says Emery's trying something.

He should be knowing what the squad is capable of by now, now, don't forget he has a habit of extensively analysing the players and he did so with all our players even before joining us. So trying doesn't make any sense. Playing Xhaka in CB position when some of your decent performing youngsters are available is not trying (rather not trusting) .

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Feb 2019 11:39:21
Just a quick one to remind you all that the donations page for the charity match between my team (winners) and Ed002's team (losers) for later in the year. Here is the link: Just Giving Page and thank you all it is for 2 good charities the teams are competing to raise funds.

Believable2 Unbelievable0

11 Feb 2019 07:41:45
62 - good article on "she wore a yellow ribbon" that could have been written to you and I plus a few others who I won't single out on this site :

Only fans of The Arsenal could moan when we win.

"Yes saturdays performance wasn't a 10/ 10, but with 3 of our best defenders out right now and Emery wanting to build from the back we may struggle. With Granit Xhaka out we may struggle. With both Ramsey and Ozil out we may struggle. And with the 2nd highest goalscorer in the league this season out, we may struggle. We struggled, but we won, job done. "

Just nice to get some balance on Emery's tenure todate to keep me honest

Have a great week everyone.

Believable1 Unbelievable7

11 Feb 2019 08:00:19
Haha if this was a one off fixture under those circumstances then I’m with you all day long but we’ve had all those players fit and still be garbage.

Emery has done zero so far to prove he is better than Wenger.

Mislintat brought in the quality additions we have, Emery is making them look pony. Mislintat has gone. Figure that one out.

Agree1 Disagree7

11 Feb 2019 08:28:57
I do think for some fans Dick is brilliant Just because he's not Arsene and for them that's enough.
What can you do? To each their own.
From a strictly football point of view it makes absolutely no sense to be any happier with Dick than with Arsene because absolutely nothing is different now that it was last season.
Dick has a little under a season and a half to show he is different and is more capable than Arsene because I'm pretty certain that many of those fans who are simply happy for Dick not to be Arsene right now will be wanting a lot lot more this time next season when the delight of simply having a different manager has long worn off.

Agree1 Disagree6

11 Feb 2019 13:37:24
Without repeating what's been said on here time and time again, what is concerning people with Emery is that we are looking and playing identically to previous, which is not what we were expecting. Solskjaer has got Man U playing differently to the previous manager within weeks, with the same players, and yet we are still playing the same (boring) slow, flat build up, and over committing full backs and midfielders when we have the ball, and therefore being completely vulnerable to swift attacks down the channels.

This is exactly the same as under Wengers final seasons. Yes, we have to give him more time, and I have seen glimpses of what could be, with the Chelsea home game an example, where we played a more diamond 442 formation, so for me a good example that he can set us up differently. If he can get us playing with more pace, with the ball being transferred up the pitch quicker (like Huddersfield did against us on Saturday) , with more movement from the forwards, perhaps trying to run in behind the defence, rather than coming towards the ball player (watch Man City versus us, an absolute masterclass on how to drag defenders out of position) , then yes, i will change my mind. Emery started out as an 8 out of 10 choice for me, but has now slipped to a 5 out of 10. Depending on how we do next season was always going to be his make or break, and i haven't changed my mind on that.

Agree1 Disagree0

11 Feb 2019 15:09:36
I think that somes up much of what people are feeling brilliantly Epping mate, we wanted change but all we have so far is a change of personality not style or method from what we had before.
Emery or Arsene what's the difference?

Agree0 Disagree1

11 Feb 2019 15:45:59
Thanks G62. I realise that i responded to the wrong post, it was supposed to be a response to HenryNostalgia! However, to be honest, what i said could pretty much go into any post on here for the past few weeks! I am still more optimistic than pessimistic, in that we knew in the end with Arsene that he couldn't/ wouldn't change our set up, and we were stuck in a Groundhog Day type scenario. With Emery, for me, he still has an opportunity to surprise by changing our set up and style, but ultimately, if were still playing the same football this time next year, then i think we will need to look for a new manager. Someone who actually plays a different way to what we are currently doing.

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Feb 2019 16:27:19
g62, mate, you're starting to sound a lot like me! haha.

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Feb 2019 17:41:54
Not been on here in ages so this was a good read. Are we the worst team in the top6 imo yes. Happy to give him time but the clear out is massive.

Totally different job to utd imo plus they finished second last year don't forget and the players just stopped for the manager

I don't see top4 it will be the 4 that are there now. All on Europa and winning it would imo be massive for the club.

Klopp I'm sure has changed the whole starting 11 since he arrived could be wrong. Done a great job love the guy but changes were needed and same goes to arsenal player wise .

Hope everyone is ok.

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Feb 2019 18:15:26
Hey DG, good to see you back. All good here. Just missing Dags, he seems to have gone AWOL as well!

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Feb 2019 20:10:26
Hi Sharpie, yes you've knocked all that silly enjoying football out of me, gone is the beer and crisps watching the games and back are the note book and magnifying glass looking for and making notes on every tiny mistake I can possibly find :-)
Hi Derby mate great to hear from you Geeza.

Agree0 Disagree0

Review Of The Day 11th February 2019

11 Feb 2019 07:29:02
{Ed's Note - Ed001 has posted a new article entitled, Review Of The Day 11th February 2019

Believable0 Unbelievable0