Arsenal Banter Archive April 18 2014

 

Use our rumours form to send us arsenal transfer rumours.

18 Apr 2014 23:18:31
I just met a bloke called William Hill.

What are the odds of that?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Dags
did he offer you 150-1 on the double

Agree0 Disagree0

Met an old school friend yesterday and he was telling all about how well he'd done for himself, flash car, 5 bed house with swimming pool etc etc.
Then he said ' you should see my wife she, s a real stunner' and took out his wallet to show me her photo of her.
I said ' if you think she's a stunner you should see my missus'
'What's she a stunner as well is she' he asked

No she's an optician, I told him

Agree0 Disagree0

PMSL
62

Agree0 Disagree0

He's a dark horse,

*who?*

Black beauty

Agree0 Disagree0

Not seen him about for a while,

*whos that?*

invisible man

Agree0 Disagree0

18 Apr 2014 21:42:37
Yet another post about our injuries.

I have been following Arsenal for over 40 years now and as far as I can remember I have never known an injury list like it. (I'm sure most supporters can say the same about their team).

For example, when did you ever see Dixon, Winterburn, Adams and Keown injured? In fact, I can't even remember, apart from Steve Bould, who our 'reserve' defender's were.

Henry injured? Vieira? Pires? (maybe), Bergkamp? Petit? Lauren?
Even going back a few more years, the likes of David O'Leary, Pat Rice, Frank McLintock, Alan Sunderland, Frank Stapleton, Brian Talbot, Rocastle, Rix, Brady, Michael Thomas, I'm just plucking names out of the air now.

But my point is, I hardly remember these players getting injuries.

Sure, the modern game has changed. It's faster, more physical, more tactical, more life or death, but surely with change comes more advanced diets/nutrition/protective boots/pads, so why do we get so many long-term injuries?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Dags

The answer is simple.
Giroud has not been injured much, and has pretty decent form away from home.
Book up the entire premier inn.

YNWA

Agree0 Disagree0

I think like your previous post about the extra games, back in the 70s 80s and early 90s to an extent there wasn't as much euro football.
I would also say I believe pre season currently consists of fitness training the players which wouldn't be to dissimilar to marines training. The need/desire to get the players to peak match fitness so quickly, then continuing pretty heavy fitness training through the season, I'm not surprised that by Xmas when the fixture list piles up we suffer from all these injuries.
Surely by the time your 6-8 weeks into a season fitness training should be at a minimum ( unless obviously the player is recovering from injury ). When you think about marathon runners, the won't run a marathon every time the go for a jog. Probably 10-15 miles at a time. When you play football every 3 days pretty much the only thing training should be for is tactics, something we have clearly struggled with this season.

Agree0 Disagree0

Mick, there is a rumour that he scores more in the Premier Inn than he does in the Premier league, lol

Agree0 Disagree0

Good points Rocky, totally agree mate.

Agree0 Disagree0

I should hope so too Dags, he, s scored less than skrtel since christmas and you wouldent f@@? with him.

Agree0 Disagree0

Now this is another gem of a question and a tough one to answer. I really don't think that it can be blamed on our medical team entirely if at all. let's go back a few years. Pitches were shot to pieces come Febuary we never had the space age treatment we have now as an example a cartilage operation would put you in a plaster cast and you were out of action for 6 months now its keyhole surgery and walk out the hospital that day etc. I think the a lot of the blame has to come down to the salaries players are getting. Why? Because when clubs are paying the massive salaries they are now the club as a company are under pressure to get those players back on the pitch. The company has a duty to keep the supporters happy, shareholders and so on. So therefore the medical staff are also under pressure. Now this is my controversial part! Ill call it "The Eye Of The Tiger " Players being hungry enough! I'm not saying all but you can bet your life that when some players are on 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100 thousand pounds a week there is not a great rush in worrying about whether they are fit yet. I'm not saying they want to be unfit. I'm saying that some players drag it out. Years ago the more a player put in the bigger the star he become not like today when a player is a star by virtue of his pay packet. Years ago a player seemed to want to play because they had passion for the game and the club. They wanted to be fit if you were not on the pitch nobody knew who you were. Today that's all taken care of by the media! You could be a famous footballer just by being seen in the directors box on TV on a pair of crutches or by being a TV pundit. So I'm going to say to this question that there is no hunger to get back like there was. There you go .

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed025's Note - good post that goldie..

DAGS
I think Lord Wenger gets good players to the top of their game.
We own a share in a race horse the bloody thing is the vets best mate.my daughter has some old nag, thing is as tuff as old boots.
I don't agree with it being more physical,, but they are at their peak fitness

Agree0 Disagree0

Top reply Golds

Agree0 Disagree0

Agree about the hunger Gold. But would you say that's down to poor management? I mean take Man Utd, their wages have been considerably higher than ours for the last 10 years. Fergie wouldn't let the hunger drop, and you could tell that by when a "2nd string player" was called upon they would play so well they would end up keeping their place for some time. Where as like you say there's an element of complacency amongst certain players because they know even if they play well replacing a regular first teamer they will be back on the sidelines no matter how well they do.

Agree0 Disagree0

Hello goldB

excellent post. none of them will of course admit to it, but I think you are pretty near the mark.
you've hit the nail on the head:)

COYG! we need our 4th place trophy:):) haha andi doesn't mind:P

COYG andi:)

Agree0 Disagree0

Ummmm, a tough one.

I personally think it's because our players are overplayed and the squad is not big enough.

When I say the squad not being big enough, I mean simply the amount of 1st team regulars.

As a 1st team player, there must be an immense pressure to be the best you can be. To make everyone happy, knowing that being injured for to long could mean you lies your spot to an emerging player.

Thus pushing yourself to hard, overdoing the physio etc. ultimately increasing the risk of further injury.

Agree0 Disagree0

Arsene's ancient training methods and the lack of quality squad depth which leads to players being overplayed. Simple.

Agree0 Disagree0

ROCKY. On Manchester United and Moyes . The perfect answer is to your question is " A new broom doesn't! always sweep clean " and that's what we have to watch out for.

Agree0 Disagree0

New broom old broom that is the question Gold's, as you say new brom doesn't always sweep clean but look at Spurs, they've had the same old broom 40 years, ok its had 15 new heads and twenty odd new handles but its still the same old broom that cleans up nowhere slowly and leaves everything looking worse than before it started

Agree0 Disagree0

Our training methods are outdated

Funny how other than breaks and tears, they are all muscle related injuries

It's the same every year

Agree0 Disagree0

US
what make you think they are out of date mate
i guessing its a guess

Agree0 Disagree0

18 Apr 2014 20:10:51
Just a question for the Eds and my fellow Gooners.

I know the TV companies pump huge amounts of money into the game and it does have it's plus points, ie, we can all watch matches and it gives our clubs more revenue to spend on players etc but, do you think it is right that they can completely dictate to the Premier League in terms of fixture scheduling/rescheduling.

Even the Premier League today confirmed that if they have an application from a club to rearrange a forthcoming fixture, ie, due to European committments, than the PL get in touch with the TV companies to ask their permission.

If the TV company say's "No", than the PL refuse to reschedule the fixture, much to the annoyance of the club involved.

Like I said earlier, the TV companies are massive players in football but do you think it is right that they are bigger than the Premier League itself? (Certainly in terms of fixtures)

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed007's Note - If you dance with the Devil, you're going to get burnt DG. Sly Spurt's money (and TV deals in general) is slowly killing the game I grew up watching. I'm sick to the back teeth of fans from clubs like Norwich, WBA and Southampton banging on about how their club is bigger than Celtic, without TV money we blow them out the water with our history, fan base, stadium etc. In 2011 Celtic had the 10th highest matchday income in Europe, beating teams Man City, Werder Bremen and both Milan clubs.
At least clubs like Chelsea and Man City are spending their owner's money, I have no problem with that, Celtic have THREE billionaires on the board, the club is self-sufficient and posted profits of £21.3 million last year (through CL money and incoming transfer fees) but we can't compete wages wise with teams in England backed by their TV money and although I would like to see the board splash the money I can understand why they don't, the club could end up in serious trouble if we were to rely on their personal fortune as we are probably near the maximum possible income we could have so why throw millions at the squad when there isn't going to be any rise in income but there would be a significant rise in the expenditure.}

Wow,

Thanks Ed 007, great answer and you certainly threw some light on the subject.

As you said, Celtic are a very self- sustainable club, with one of the biggest stadia in the UK (I think only Old Trafford, Wembley and Millenium stadiums are bigger) and average attendances of approx 60,000.

I also believe you have a very shrewd chairman, Ian Banks I think his name is, who always makes sure he never cripples the club by overspending/investing.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - Ian Bankier it is and he does seem to know what he's doing with the financial side of things. Our attendances have dropped recently on the domestic front, the team is needing some new blood and IMO we need a change in manager, but when it comes to the CL matches tickets are like gold-dust up here and the place is packed to the rafters.}

Especially when you turned Barca over, lol

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - We can't live off that result though, although Lennon's trying his best to. They pumped us in this season's competition.}

True Ed, but it will still go down in Celtic folklore mate

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - We usually do well against the so called bigger teams but struggle against the ones we expect to get a result against. There aren't many teams that look forward to playing us at Celtic Park. I do think that we should be consistently looking for 2nd place in our CL groups or at least 3rd and dropping down to the EL but we seem to either do really well or do really bad. I'd like to see a foreign manager brought in who will change the playing philosophy at the club, the actual football we play leaves a lot to be desired and the team doesn't seem to be evolving on that front, if anything it's going backwards.
Keep an eye out for a Dutch central defender we bought last summer called Virgil van Dijk, he is on the fringes of the Holland squad and will be our next big sale either this summer or next. He's only 22 and is as cool as you like on the ball, reads the game well, has pace, good in the air and even chips in with a few goals including free-kicks.}

Woooooooooooo 007. good guy! a kiss from me

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - Thanks.... but no tongues ;)

Ed, give me bobo balde anytime mate. Absolute beast.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed007's Note - He was that, then Martin O'Neill gave him a £35k a week contract just before he left the club and Bobo's attitude went south very quickly so he sat in the stands for 2/3 seasons collecting his money which turned a lot of fans against him.}

18 Apr 2014 20:13:08
Interesting stat from today's papers.

I hope this doesn't come across as sour grapes but Liverpool have played 12 games fewer than us this season.

Let the debate begin.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

I would say that ours and liverpools squads fully fit are pretty similar. We both have a great first 11 but the back ups are a little weak. Obviously the amount of games played makes a difference and the injuries certainly come from more games being played so liverpool have certainly had that advantage.
Take Saurez or sturridge out and their next striker is Aspas. Would he have the same impact as say Sanogo, quite possibly. Take Gerrard out and would their midfield be as strong. Who have they got to fill his boots?
The question will properly be answered this time next year when Liverpool have those extra games to play.

Agree0 Disagree0

Monsieur Dagenoir

Sour grapes indeed.

Did you miss something?

Liverpool tactics 1,, smash 4 in 20 minutes
2,, rest up
3,, buy more little hendersons
4,, sorted.

YNWA

Kind regards

Agree0 Disagree0

Good perspective Rocky mate.

Agree0 Disagree0

Those Extra games make a big difference I don't think to many would argue with that, I think pound for pound our team and squad are better not sour grapes just my opinion.
Ramsey most importantly but so many injuries haven't helped our cause, but the single biggest difference is Suarez.
He has had an unbelievable season and his form has brought belief to others that has grown and grown. Put Ranaldo in the Everton team?
A player like that who makes and scores so many goals is sometimes the difference between a 4 th place battle and a title challenge

Agree0 Disagree0

Ouch Sizemick,

I wasn't having a dig I promise (well just a little one I guess), lol.

And get your facts right, it was 4 in 19 minutes, so up yours mate.

(Smiles)

Agree0 Disagree0

Good points G62

Agree0 Disagree0

18 Apr 2014 18:51:01
How would the invincibles have faired in the final standings of this season's BPL?

ANSWERS:

A) Champions
B) Runners up
C) Third / Fourth
D) Europa Spots
E) Above Spurs (please note A, B, C, D all result in finishing above spurs)

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Almost impossible not to be biased in this one snip, but I think they would be well home and dry by now.
There have been very few teams supreme in my life time, the invincibles are one of those very rare teams.

Agree0 Disagree0

Definitely A

Agree0 Disagree0

It's so hard not to say A like G62 says. It's frightening how good that team was. It's even more frightening how much weaker our current team/squad is compared to the invincibles.

Agree0 Disagree0

If they had the start we did they would have cleaned up by now. No doubt in my mind about that. It's called a "PASSION TO WIN" When did you ever see them give up? That's all I've got to say on that one.

Agree0 Disagree0

18 Apr 2014 18:03:55
After watching a recent AW interview, it seemed like there was a change in his general demeanour ( recent successes) has there been any movement on Mr Wenger signing his contract, I can't help it, I still have a soft spot for the guy, even though he is bit inscrutable at times

Believable0 Unbelievable0

I think most of us still want Arsene in our hearts, its just our heads that that have lost confidence in him.
Some good really singings AND a statement that we have be prepared to adapt our style in certain games and times would soon have the vast majority very much back on Arsene's side

Agree0 Disagree0

I agree with that G62. If Arsene can change and modernise his ways and start to spend some decent money then I'd be more than happy for him to stay. However, I know in my head that he will not.

Agree0 Disagree0

For me I don't think it's a case of we still want Arsene in our hearts. I think it's a case of "Better the devil you know than the one you don't "! We may end up with a manager that takes a season or two to get himself bedded in. Look at the state Moyes is in? Who would have predicted that at United before the season started.?

Agree0 Disagree0

Sir Alex??

Agree0 Disagree0

Estepona gooner:- ole!

Agree0 Disagree0

18 Apr 2014 16:06:15
Have not seen much of joel cambel anyone know if he is good enough to provide backup for giroud if we don't sign a strikes
P.s this is not wenger in disguise

Believable0 Unbelievable0

I think he definitely is. Plenty of pace and a skilful player. Scored for Olympiakos against Manchester United so can't be bad.

Agree0 Disagree0

Goldie
i watched him in them games and wasnt that impressed with him
1 for the future but I wouldn't be to happy if we pinned our next campaign on him

Agree0 Disagree0

Is he not better then Sanogo, if not we should cut him now.

Agree0 Disagree0

Keep him out on loan and have him back in a few years time.

Agree0 Disagree0

Sell him. If he was that good we surely would have made more effort to get him a work permit. If he was that good he'd be on loan to a top 6 side in Italy/Spain/Germany

Agree0 Disagree0

ROCKYIVII. Good point mate never looked at it that way!

Agree0 Disagree0

18 Apr 2014 15:04:47
With the PFA player of the year nominations just being announced I can't help but feel gutted for Rambo, but for the injury he would surely have been in contention.
Hey ho Aaron you and Mesut can battle it out next season.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

Totally agree G62

Agree0 Disagree0

18 Apr 2014 13:26:07
JANMAN

Oh how the memory fades, have you forgotten the 2001 final in Cardiff. lol

You can't help where you are drawn to play or how many PL sides you come across, this season we had our fill of top flight sides and despatched them rather well I think.

As for the Championship we beat they managed to achieve something Liverpool failed to do. win away at M City

Believable0 Unbelievable0

17 Apr 2014 19:30:04
Hi Eds, any interest in any of the Southampton boys?
Shaw? Chambers? Lallana? Rodriguez?

Cheers

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - Not from Arsenal.}

17 Apr 2014 17:50:15
Eds, have Dortmund signed Ginter? A lot of rumours that they have but is it official?
Thanks

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - The transfer window is closed so they have not signed him - but Ginter is expected to move to Dortmund.}

Thanks Ed, meant pre-signed, like they have with Sahin. Does this mean our focus for a centre back has switched to someone else?

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - Ginter cannot sign any form of pre-contract agreement.}

Ok thanks Ed

Agree0 Disagree0

I remember we announced Poldi a while before he arrived how did we do that without a pre-contract ed?

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - They agreed a fee with his club.}

Though this was me for a second. Please don't scare me that!

Agree0 Disagree0

18 Apr 2014 09:07:50
Arsene says Mesut Ozil will be Arsenals player of the year next season, I wouldn't argue with that for a minute, but I think with a fully fitt Theo Aaron and Ox plus 2 or 3 very good signings Ozil might just prove to be a bit more than just our player of the year 2014/15.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

If you look at the bles - if Aaron had stayed fit and MO had only had a couple of week off we would surely have been right up there with the leaders

Agree0 Disagree0

Ozil has 43 million resons to be our top player.
but how can you not love the welshman.
pure class .

Agree0 Disagree0