Arsenal Banter Archive July 09 2016

 

Use our rumours form to send us arsenal transfer rumours.

09 Jul 2016 19:29:28
I see the season hasn't started yet and Wenger is already being whipped. I cannot honestly think of what this man has done to deserve so much animosity

Wenger has failed badly in the last 3 to 4 seasons to mount a serious challenge and bolster the squad in an adequate manner. No one has ever tried to dispute that and last season was a monumental failure. But to dismiss what this man has done for this club is disrespective to his legacy.

Malaga; by all indications Arsenal are a really big Club and me supporting all the way from South Africa is testament to that. The Club is huge here despite Wenger doing nothing for 12 years. My question is which big club lost all the class players we lost, built a new stadium and managed to remain in the CL every season?

This is no excuse for the failures of the past few seasons, we all see that. But remember Wenger Could also have jumped ship. He has stated many times that he had offers from the biggest clubs in the land yet stayed with us. He should have done more with the financial constraints a thing of the past, but to slag him off for the barren years is very harsh and frankly unfair.

Yeah its easy to belittle the man in retrospect . The question from my perspective is not whether he would have been sacked at another "big" club, But rather which other world class manager would have stayed under the same conditions .

Believable1 Unbelievable5

09 Jul 2016 19:46:26
Just out of interest who made offers to Wenger?

Genuine question.

Agree3 Disagree0

09 Jul 2016 20:32:52
I read the other day that wenger has never been offered a job by either man u, man city, chelsea, real, bayern, Barcelona or juventus, ever, so who are these big clubs, better than he is at.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - he has been offered the Man City job on more than one occasion.}

09 Jul 2016 20:39:53
Not what i read but i will take your word for it ed.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - I was told that by one of the ownership group at City, so I would think it true, as he has no reason to lie. It was in the early days of the City project. Pep was always the main long term target.}

09 Jul 2016 21:24:39
Thanks for the info ed, do you know if he was offered the job or just sounded out, not that it matters too much, just interested.

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Jul 2016 22:11:57
If it was in the early days of the City job it was a no brainier he stayed at Arsenal

So

Just who are these clubs that lined up to grab Wenger?

Agree4 Disagree0

09 Jul 2016 23:21:40
Madrid and PSG i believe.

Agree0 Disagree4

09 Jul 2016 23:46:44
Athletico aren't big

PSG are in a league equivalent to the SPL

Hardly great choices.

Agree4 Disagree0

10 Jul 2016 00:06:16
I should add I gather you meant Real, that's far too big a risk for Wenger, winning is a must there or it's good bye.

Agree0 Disagree0

10 Jul 2016 00:27:55
I mean real madrid bg I know you have them down as not but I remember reading a lot about it over the years and former Real president Caledron has said they tried to get him, he also said wenger asked him "Are you going to Hollywood again, or to make a football team? ”,

And PSG have threatened success in the CL for a number of years now.

Agree0 Disagree3

10 Jul 2016 00:46:01
As far as i understand and its not 80% no 100% certain but psg and monaco and the france job have enquired after him at varying times and he has rebuffed them. None of the elite clubs have ever tried to get him. England are calling though. Lol.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - sorry I don't know why your previous question was not held for me, but he was offered the job. He had given his word to the board and so turned down the chance to leave, rather than break his word. You have to admire him for that, City were offering him a blank chequebook to use.}

10 Jul 2016 09:07:27
Not really Ed, with City's track record with Managers he would never have gone there no matter what money

Wenger is in his comfort zone it's very difficult to get someone to take something with risk, and risk isn't something Wenger does.

Agree0 Disagree0

10 Jul 2016 09:47:00
Im sure there have been big job offers but with them would have come very high expectations and who would swap Arsenal and top 4 being enough for Real where a champions league and la liga double probably wouldn't be enough to keep your job?
As for city well Pelgrini and Mancini both lost the job despite winning titles and cups.
On a personal level Arsene made the sensible choice staying at Arsenal.

Agree0 Disagree0

10 Jul 2016 10:08:59
To be fair Banbury say whatever about him underachieving the last few years who am I to argue that. But saying he isn't a risk taker. Surely rejecting the chance to go Madrid or city and stay at Arsenal during such a big transition is a huge risk?

Agree0 Disagree0

10 Jul 2016 10:13:19
BG, I don't think Wenger can win in your eyes here. Either it's a big club and too much risk or it's a medium sized club. Key is, they all had money to burn so success was a pretty good bet BUT he stood by OUR club. Don't we slag players off for jumping ship. Now we do the opposite to the manager.
We moan when we don't sign players before the window starts or Euris are over, we moan he doesn't find cheap gems, we moan when he signs cheap players, we moan that the expensive players were gifted to him, we moan that players join other clubs probably for personal/ money/ tax/ exchange rate/ first team opportunities or size of club. We really need to sit back as a bunch of supporters and look at ourselves.
We are never happy and moan on the radio / on line etc.
Not a dig at you but pointing out how we look.
No one is guaranteed success
We don't have an endless supply of money
We don't have a sugar daddy
We don't have the history of success like UTD or Madrid or Barcelona

We do have great values, history as a club, strong squad, big fan base and a great manager -> we are quite lucky and do I want more -> yes of course but only one team wins the league and it's bloody hard.

Agree4 Disagree3

09 Jul 2016 19:23:57
Just been searching the internet.

We are not linked with Benzema.

My internet must be broke :-)

Believable0 Unbelievable0

09 Jul 2016 20:33:42
Dags he's plan z, we are getting there though.

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Jul 2016 18:39:56
Who would you pick to be your Griezman for arsenal to play alongside Giroud?
Ox?
Sanchez?
Gnabry?
Campbell?
or
Draxler (if signed) ?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

09 Jul 2016 19:35:34
Draxler but I think we will only get him if we let Sanchez go or to put it another and B better way we will only let Sanchez leave if we sign Draxler.

Agree2 Disagree0

09 Jul 2016 19:40:21
More please.

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Jul 2016 20:10:51
For us to challenge for the title, Giroud should not be first choice.

Agree2 Disagree0

09 Jul 2016 20:39:01
Disagree he needs a good enough strike partner, he's good at holding the ball up but becomes isolated at times and would thrive on having a greizman type player to feed.

Agree0 Disagree2

09 Jul 2016 21:26:03
We will never win the league with giroud as our striker, never ever.

Agree2 Disagree1

09 Jul 2016 23:23:19
I'd take Griezmann thank you very much.

Agree1 Disagree0

09 Jul 2016 16:00:00
Afternoon Eds and all,

Seen a lot over the past week or so about Van Persie getting offered to a few PL clubs, and wondered if there was even the slightest interest in Arsenal making a move, but also which clubs (if any) would be interested.
Admittedly, this really is a shot in the dark as I know that many of the fans wouldn't want to see him make a return to the club, but I just had to wonder.
Well that and I wondered what fellow gooners might think of of it all.

Thanks and great work as always Eds.

Believable0 Unbelievable3

{Ed001's Note - none that I am aware of mate.}

09 Jul 2016 16:35:02
I think West Ham United said no thank you to him.

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Jul 2016 17:51:51
Obviously it's a non starter but on free without the history he'd have been a good 1 season option from the bench.

Agree0 Disagree2

09 Jul 2016 19:40:58
Fair point 62.

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Jul 2016 23:24:03
If I was Ranieri I'd be looking at him.

Agree0 Disagree1

10 Jul 2016 01:23:54
Gg he wouldn't be able to keep up with vardy and marez. Past it, i don't think many will touch him.

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Jul 2016 13:39:39
Wow euros Havnt finished yet and because we have only signed one the Wenger out chants are off again the guy can't win.

Believable1 Unbelievable7

09 Jul 2016 15:16:14
Your right

He can't win.

Agree8 Disagree2

09 Jul 2016 15:59:18
Nobody else good do a better job than what he has done for this club.

Agree1 Disagree7

09 Jul 2016 17:04:05
What has wenger achieved the last 12 years.

Agree5 Disagree1

09 Jul 2016 17:07:44
We live in a relative world so some could do worse while others could do better. A lot will depend on what players stay and CL qualification.

We need to move away from what we've done and towards what we can do.

Agree4 Disagree0

09 Jul 2016 17:09:02
If wenger was at a big club, he would of been sacked 8 years ago.

Agree7 Disagree2

09 Jul 2016 17:27:13
Barn,

Brilliant last sentence.

Spot on buddy.

Agree3 Disagree0

09 Jul 2016 17:44:13
If you consider Arsenal football club to less equipped to mount a serious title challenge over the last decade than Leicester and Liverpool (twice) then Arsene has done well.
But if on the other hand you consider Arsenal to be a very big club in premier league terms at least as big as Liverpool and definitely much much bigger than Leicester then Arsene has dramatically under achieved.
It all depends on your opinion of Arsenal football club is to how well Arsene has done, but either he's done well with a little club or done poorly with a big club you can't have it both ways.

Agree1 Disagree0

09 Jul 2016 18:16:50
In the last twelve years he's achieved nothing that any one else could of. For me he isn't over achieving he's under achieving. He isn't doing anything special at all, just blocking the way for some one who could.

Agree2 Disagree1

09 Jul 2016 19:42:55
As others say, they expect disappointment .

Malaga you are correct he'd be long gone

Dags good point made.

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Jul 2016 19:36:09
Malaga in the last 12 years wenger has won the league undefeated, 3 fa cups, 3 charity shields, champions league runner up, qualified for the champions league knockout stage every year whilst having hardly any finances whilst the new stadium was built and paid for! Hardly a bad record!

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Jul 2016 20:51:56
Gunnerwod he's had money to spend and chose not to. Ok last eleven years, good point, two fa cups the the com shield like our emirates cup is a friendly. The rest aren't cups. Not good enough, if he eas at a big club he would be sacked years ago.

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Jul 2016 20:52:50
OMG wodbod is a regular arsenal poster lol.

Agree0 Disagree0

10 Jul 2016 18:57:50
What has Wenger done for this club it should be not the last 12 years.

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Jul 2016 14:45:35
I saw an article earlier saying we were telling clubs Giroud 'isn't for sale' because a few clubs have started making offers.

Now, if that's true or not, I have absolutely no idea, but it did get me thinking.

Whenever I post/ reply here, with regards to Giroud, my general opinion is that Giroud isn't good enough to be our starting striker, BUT, he's good enough to be at Arsenal.
I personally think he's a good link up forward, holds up well and is a good team player, but he's not clinical or quick enough to be at the top top level.

So, when I saw this article, it made me think, would i sell Giroud?

Simply put, no.
Even if we somehow bagged a Lewandowski/ Aubamayeng/ Higauin level forward, I'd still keep Giroud at the club (if he'd stay as second choice)

I was wondering what the general consencus here was, would people keep Giroud at Arsenal?

Let's remove money from the equation, because we'd all say yes if enough money was bid, Barcelona would sell Messi for enough money (however much that'd be)
Just simply, do you think Giroud should stay at Arsenal, if we signed a 'better' forward?

Thanks in advance people!

Believable0 Unbelievable3

09 Jul 2016 15:00:32
I'd be sad to see him leave personally because his link up play can be beautiful to watch at times. We all marvelled at the Wilshere goal of the season against Norwich and the similar goal scored by Rosicky not long after and you will notice Giroud is always pivotal in these link up's with his technique and deft touches - it's just a shame he doesn't convert more of his chances with his feet (he's actually pretty clinical in the air) .

Agree0 Disagree2

09 Jul 2016 16:40:39
He's one of the best right now when it comes to holding the ball up and laying off to another runner, but he's one dimensional and not the most consistent goal scorer.

Agree0 Disagree3

09 Jul 2016 16:46:49
Yes. Defo keep D.

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Jul 2016 17:03:05
If the sale of giroud helped fund the purchase of aubamayang, levendoski or like then yes. i'm guessing 30 mil we have for striker plus money for giroud and free up his wages, yes sell him.

Agree1 Disagree0

09 Jul 2016 19:45:22
Keep for sure, as part of a 2 man strike force or from the bench Olly is an asset and the only time he stops being an asset is consistently finishing chances we make on his own up top.
Sign a poacher and keep Olly too.

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Jul 2016 19:50:53
If you sell him your left with nothing and you need to buy two that won't happen . Why sell a striker who scores 20+ in all comps? Let's get a 35+ striker to join him.

Agree1 Disagree1

09 Jul 2016 20:17:47
Giroud would be one of the first players out the door if I was the new coach. We Arsenal fans. have aproblem, even when we agree that someone is. not good enough we never want them to leave. that's why we end up with a squad of not good enoughs who can't get the job done.

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Jul 2016 20:53:57
Aubamayang and no giroud is the way for me.

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Jul 2016 22:00:03
Rue in an ideal world keep giroud and buy another top clasx striker, i'm not sure a coach would bin him straight away but he wouldn't be first choicd i agree. But if it's a case of selling giroud to help upgrade i would and rely on back up coming from within, eventually welbeck will be back and be another option. Sanchez could deputise and if he leaves and rumours are true so could draxler.

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Jul 2016 23:32:05
I'd definitely keep giroud. Not good enough to win us the league as the main striker whatever anyone thinks of his attributes he has shown this with patchy form throughout his arsenal career, yet he still has the ability to be dangerous and get goals.

Would be the best second option in the prem, when walcott and giroud were alternating for a period as starter he scored goals of the bench and that would serve us well. He also seems to tire when he gets a continued run in the team perhaps this is cause for his patchy form. Having a another option ahead of him, or at least someone better than Walcott would help his form by getting more rest.

I remember when we had wiltord and kanu to come of the bench, neither good enough to lead the line for a season but fantastic options of the bench and for rotation. We struggle to win games gainst "smaller" opposition when we rotate the side. Giroud would be invalubale in picking up points as a second option.

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Jul 2016 09:46:39
We should consider the fact that Giroud and Kos might miss the opening game of the season.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

09 Jul 2016 09:58:39
Don't they all have to have 4 weeks break after a summer's tournament?
Which will mean they will be back a week before the season kicks off.
Personally I wouldn't rush them back and give them until September if need be as those two being out long term would be pretty difficult to do without.

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Jul 2016 10:15:11
Yes but with no training under their belt

I think the start of September looks likely.

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Jul 2016 10:22:59
Well, Ramsey said he won't be back till the end of August, so I would think that kos and Giroudwill be back at least a week after.

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Jul 2016 10:35:39
Two seasons back we played both Olly and Kos in a CL qualifier while injured because we didn't fancy it without them but both ended up out long term.
If we can't get the players to cope without them we should use tactics to deal with thier absence.

Agree2 Disagree0

09 Jul 2016 23:33:55
And Sanchez given his new injury and enormous amount of games and miles he has clocked up in the last 2/3 seasons.

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Jul 2016 07:43:35
Ed01.Just read about this up and coming German sensation called Hopundlimp. He sounds perfect for us.
What do you know about him mate?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

{Ed001's Note - I believe he fits the Arsenal model to a tee. Always on the injury table and will be like a new signing every single transfer window, just before picking up another knock that puts him out for 4 months or so.}

09 Jul 2016 08:14:08
Love it Ed.
Or are you talking about Wilshere? :-)

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed001's Note - he is the Arsenal model isn't he?}

09 Jul 2016 13:57:26
Thanks Ed01.
If we sign Hopundlimp I reckon Wilshire will leave as they would be fighting for the same position 😂.

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Jul 2016 14:20:47
I can't find anything about him online, another one for the future?

Agree0 Disagree1

09 Jul 2016 16:42:29
You're surely joking, barn.

Agree1 Disagree0

09 Jul 2016 17:09:26
Indeed. Disappointed with the lack of bites. Must be more sophisticated next time.

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Jul 2016 00:23:18
Hey you all,
Would you take draxler to be our new striker?

Believable5 Unbelievable5

09 Jul 2016 23:47:11
Not for me moe.

Has he been used as a striker? I've only seen him in a winger or SS role. Not a major goal scorer in any regard.

Got great feet but his not the finished article. Shows flashes of brilliance but if he hasn't regressed since coming to people attention at 19 he hasn't exactly improved either. When he was available and moved to wolfsburg there were no bigger takers for him which says a lot for me.

I enjoy watching him and his ilk in a player, head down taking lads on and beating them is a beauty to watch and we don't have enough of that imo. Sanchez gets shown on his weaker foot a lot and telegraphs his cut to the right foot every time. Ox used to do and succeed a lot more at that when he first arrived (i wonder if wenger drilled it out of his game because its higher risk of losing possession or something to that effect)

Anyway I rambling. As much as I like him and enjoy watching him I'm prefer spending the budget on more established central options and given Ox is the same age and similar type of player I'd stick with him

If it was a case that we could fund a move by shifting Ox I'd probably bite even though I'm a massive ox fan (often seems too immature to have the killer instinct that's needed)

Agree0 Disagree0