30 Aug 2017 11:41:39
My view, ox is just money in the bank to reinvest, Sanchez is not, he is nearly irreplaceable. I've heard we are asking 70 mil, we ust hold out, citeh want him. I want him to stay but money from ox and Sanchez could replace Sanchez, only problem is it's too late in the window. Looks like poor management again.

1.) 30 Aug 2017
30 Aug 2017 12:05:53
And another poor season ahead.

2.) 30 Aug 2017
30 Aug 2017 12:13:17
If he's irreplaceable, what do we do next year when we lose him on a free and don't get any money in for him to reinvest?

3.) 30 Aug 2017
30 Aug 2017 12:16:01
Spot on, both will probably go, Oxlade is money in the bank to bring in a RWB. This season we could use Chambers and Maitland-Niles as cover for Bellerin. Sanchez is a hard player to replace. Yes, we can play Welbeck and others in the left attacking role, but we lose a top quality player who will be virtually impossible to replace with a player of similar quality. Sterling, Lemar and Draxler are possibilities,

4.) 30 Aug 2017
30 Aug 2017 12:31:15
I would take the Money for Sanchez (£55-60m) reinvest on Draxler if interested. Also why are we not after Krychowiak? on loan, not really a gamble is it?

5.) 30 Aug 2017
30 Aug 2017 12:43:53
If Sanchez is irreplaceable then why bother trying. Instead use the money to strengthen somewhere else where the money will make a big difference, such as DM or CD. Our issue has been playing two attack minded CM's leaves us completely exposed. A way to deal with it is to play 2 up front not 3, which would allow us to play 3 central midfielders, with one being the dedicated DM behind the 2 box to box type players. Its a shame as this system might have also allowed the Ox to play his favoured CM role with us, rather than going somewhere else.

6.) 30 Aug 2017
30 Aug 2017 14:47:31
Dags it is looking bleaker by the minute. What a disaster this summer is turning into for arsenal football club.