Arsenal Rumours Archive April 04 2012

 

Use our rumours form to send us arsenal transfer rumours.

04 Apr 2012 23:30:09
Every team has a player who the manager loves and the fans don't think is good enough!
Jonny Evans
Gareth Barry
Mikel
Jay Spearing
Kranjar
AARON RAMSEY

Believable5 Unbelievable17

Haha yeah, our only trouble is we can add a few to that list!

Agree0 Disagree0

Thats pretty much bulls**t

evans - utd fans love him. check their forums.
barry - same as evans ^^
mikel - no fan or manager loves him
spearing - same as barry and evans
kranjar - not a starter, redknapp does not love him and spurs fans like him actually
ramey - the odd one out

Agree0 Disagree0

Granted ramsey is not playing well (not beyond awful though) and out of position but he's a long way off that kind of list and if he were he would be about 7/8 down from our squad players

Agree0 Disagree0

Ramsey needs a loan to, say, Wigan, should they stay up. They play passing (if weak) football and he needs to get his confidence up

Agree0 Disagree0

Seriously the fella has scored the same Modric and has one less assist get off the kids back, why would anyone want to play for this club with fans like you.
Galway gooner

Agree0 Disagree0

I would Take Ramsey over Song any day.

Agree0 Disagree0

Yeah I agree atleast ramsey doesn't give ball away time and time again and isn't the lazy liabillity that song has become.

Agree0 Disagree0

Ramsey is a good player in the wrong position. He is naturally a CM, but with Wilshire, wenger has been forced to play him in a more attacking position.

If you remember, initially Arteta was the advanced midfielder and was not coping well with such little time on the ball.

Ramsey is not a Rosicky/Wilshire type, with quick feet - but he is doing a decent job of plugging the hole.

Billybob

Agree0 Disagree0

04 Apr 2012 18:10:32
I heard Wilshere was definitely pencilled in to play this morning however it was another set-back (something to do with the knee)
Apparently its tendinitis, the same thing that kept Kos out of the Villa game. If true at least that's relatively minor compared to another ankle setback.

Sundays game is taking ages to roll round, really big game..
Eman.

Believable11 Unbelievable3

He's ready to come back... He wasn't risked for this game, incase of a set back.

He'll be on the bench against City...

=Miss Arsenal.

P.S - I'm HOPING/PRAYING the above, it's not "inside knowledge" lol!

Agree0 Disagree0

Absolutely no chance he will be on the bench against city!
He was fatigued after intense training, so didn't play against Birmingham.
Expect him to be involved for last 2/3 games

Agree0 Disagree0

He wasnt even training this morning .... one of the mates on an arsenal fans page we have ..... was at the training ground this morning and he was only in the gym, still weeks away

Agree0 Disagree0

I would be very surprised to see him on the bench to be honest. I would rather he gets some sheltered reserve games first.

I would rather gamble on Diaby if we are short options for the bench.

Billybob

Agree0 Disagree0

04 Apr 2012 18:01:53
Screw m'vila. A midfield of: coquelin, song, wilshere
Would be the best in the league surely. We have depth in the DM position (song, coquelin, frimpong (vertonghen) wilshere etc.) And why would wenger spend £17million on one defensive mid, when his six best have been a combined £11.5million(viera, petit, song, flamini, gilberto)!
Harry

Believable12 Unbelievable23

Song isn't a natural defensive midfielder he likes to attack to much and leaves the denfence unprotected, as for wilshere we know his qualities are his vision and passing. We need a solid dm since frimpong is injured and inexperienced. We sold Viera for 20million euros so £17m is about the going rate for quality dm. You could argue since we lost viera that are midfield has never been as solid - except for the season flamini really started playing then left for money.

Agree0 Disagree0

While I kinda understand your point mate, I think your off the mark, Coquelin impressed a lot of people in his stint as a utility player before his injury. But we only saw like 4-5 games from him, for all we know he could come back and be terrible! Frankly for me he needs to go to a club on loan, like our new best pals Bolton, it's ok knowing how to play nice football at the higher end of a table, it's another playing a physical game at the other end, for me frimpong is better than Coquelin, but for me arsenal are missing that enigma kind of player who will divide opinions.

As for your song point, I'll be the first to hold my hands up and say, yeah I have him stick because he's not the defensive midfielder arsenal need.
And I stick by that because he isn't, he's really evolving into a attacking mid role, don't forget Cesc started as a cdm ( in not saying he'll be the new Cesc, so hold your horses people!) and I think he should stay there, let's face it the bloke is a brilliant creator! Now M'villa, for those who haven't seen him DOES have a tendency to pop forward at times, not as often as song but he does, however the difference is, our first choice midfield three right now would be (with all fit) Wilshere, song, Arteta/rosicky/Ramsey (I only put Rambo as wenger seems to like him from the off!)

Now if wilshere and one of the others go forward, song is our final line before defence, then great he's quick, strong and a decent tackler, now say song and one of the others go, then jacks left there, and for me that's ok, he's not the biggest but the boy plays with his heart on his sleeve and really puts a shift in, finally put song and wilshere forward, none of the other three do I trust as a cdm, rosicky just isn't a defensive player, Ramsey makes mistakes too often, and isn't that quick, and Arteta isn't really the type to get stuck in!

Now imagine Wilshere, M'villa and song, unless all three go forward, there's always one capable midfielder holding the line.

Arsenal need to beef up there midfield mate, I'd love gotze or kagawa, but Wilshere will honesty be like a new signing for us and I can see the ox matching if not beating Goetze for ability by the end of next season, if Goetze or Kagawa or Martin or Marin do join then fantastic! But I'd genuinely be happier with M'villa.

Let's face it.

We've signed Podolski, it's the most official unofficial signing ever.

If we don't get Vertongen after he's literally told us to come get him, wenger needs his head looking at

And M'villa who's basically said Arsenal or Madrid, our advantage there is game time, at Madrid he's looking at displacing Xabi, Khedira, diarra and that's just as a cdm/holding mid player.

Couple those with possibly Suarez, and I hear Dzagoev is looking really likely (could anyone back me up/ dispel that last bit? Cheers)

Your really looking at contenders,

Now, I know that post was an epic, and every time I post I seem to wade in with an argument which makes seem a bit of a (insert word here)

But I honestly respect everyone's views, I just get too passionate about my club!

D

Agree0 Disagree0

Great post D.

I totally agree with you.

Els

Agree0 Disagree0

Wilshire defensive midfielder? LOOOOOOOl his not made to do that job it's not his game arsenal big players always start playing from the back as its more freedom not because they are defensive midfielders!!

Agree0 Disagree0

To the "LOOOOOOOOL" guy

If you read the post properly mate, you'll see I never says wilshere was a defensive mid, I simply suggested that if song and the other of our midfield trio were forward, wilshere is capable of holding the line for a bit.

If you're going to slate me, go ahead, just make sure your right first?

D

Agree0 Disagree0

D - some good points. But I worry a midfield of Wilshire/Song/M'vila - will make our midfield a bit static.

From what I have seen this season, our best in-form midfield trio has been Rosicky/Arteta/Song.

The main reason for this is not defensive solidity, but their ability to pass the ball and to be quick on their feet.

The risk with replacing Arteta for M'vila (and upgrading rosicky to Wilshire), is that far too much of the creative burden will fall on Wilshire. While song does venture forward, he is not fully commited and making runs into the box. Bare in mind Gilberto and Viera used to venture quite far up the pitch too, so did Flamini.

The problem you are highlighting is a fair point, but that has more to do with our gameplan than it does with the players we have.

So for me, I have come to accept that we will always be a possession based attacking team, and there for need a player that can take the burden of creating attacks off of Wilshire.

Christian Eriksen is my Dream signing.

Billybob

Agree0 Disagree0

Billybob-

Yeah I guess that's a bit of a risk I missed!
Although I reckon Song would step up with the creative if a man like M'villa took care of defensive duties. I hope they'd be reminiscent of petit and viera!

I'd like erikson too mate! He'd be a gamble I admit but a fantastic player if he could adapt to our league

Satin that, my dream signing would be Lucas from Sao Paulo!

But that is definitely a dream!

D

Agree0 Disagree0

04 Apr 2012 17:34:30
According to Give Me Football, who seem to be very pro-Arsenal which is hugely refreshing, we are 'leading the charge for Montpellier striker Olivier Giroud'...excellent stuff, lets' hope it's true.

Raz

Believable14 Unbelievable6

It also said that he could cost up to 50m :/ {Ed002's Note - It was expected that Giroud would stay within France with a move to PSG but performances this season have seen Lyon, Marseille, Valencia, Newcastle, Villarreal, Arsenal and particularly Malaga show an interest. At one point Nicollin discussed the interest in the player saying Newcastle were too minor a club and Arsenal would have to pay 50M euros, if not 60M euros for the player. The reality is that he will move for perhaps 20M euros or so in the summer as it will be tough for Montpellier to persuade him to stay. Interest at the moment is still being shown by Arsenal and Bayern Munich have made an approach to Montpellier. The player declared an interest in a move to Italy but much will depend on the price - I don't see Marseille being able to pay enough, nor perhaps Lyon. It is possible that Liverpool may become interested but at present I understand they are not.}

Agree0 Disagree0

He won't be coming to Arsenal unless RVP is sold.

ibster

Agree0 Disagree0

04 Apr 2012 12:29:06
Kagawa reported to be stalling on a new Dortmund deal to get a move to the prem. Just saying, if we can't have Goetze... would love having the next best thing. He and Miyaichi, teaming up on national team and for us, not to mention how skilled he is in CAM (a weak position for us). Would be a superb signing for us I think

Believable30 Unbelievable6

90% chance he will stay with dortmund. Great if we could get him tho. Has not only a stack of assists, but can find the net too.

Marty

Agree0 Disagree0

I have a suspicion the rumour of our representatives being in dortmund a couple of weeks ago might have been for kagawa and not gotze! miyaichi at AFC would be a bonus for him as players from far flung places do enjoy having a compatriot at their club. I hope we get him as Japanese players have a great work ethic and respect for their seniors, its just part of their culture + he is very good!
ricky the sg

Agree0 Disagree0

He'd be a great signing, no doubt, but I think there's a higher chance of him joining Man. United. He's said in the past something like "Joining MU would be a dream", and he also doesn't seem a Hazard-esque guy who'd whore himself to the highest bidder. I think, given the success he's had early in his career at BVB, MU would be the logical choice. Just my opinion, though.

Pakistan AFC

Agree0 Disagree0

Great great player who will without a doubt improve our squad but im almost certain he'll remain at dortmund for at least another season

Greg

Agree0 Disagree0

Have we not got one of the hotest prospects in the CAM position in the country who doesnt get played in his favoured position and still performs amazingly yet everybody thinks we need to spend big money on somebody when the OX being unleashed next season instead of sitting on the bench would be even more money to spend on a striker.

Agree0 Disagree0

^^^^ Hes 18 For Goodness Sake Let Him Continue Playing On The Wing And When Wenger Believes Hes Ready Hell Move Him. We Cant Expect To Win The League And Even Cl When Our Most Creative Player Is A 19 With Only One Year Of Top Flight football.

Agree0 Disagree0

The wing is not his preferred position he came to us as a CAM that could play on the wing!

Agree0 Disagree0

Kagawa would be a dream come true for me. Quick, good passer (reminds me of Rosicky, with his outside of the foot passes), decent finisher.

Sadly, I doubt he will leave BVB, as the fans would riot in Dortmund. He is a fan favourite and has taken a lot of the burden of Gotze's injury.

He is quite frankly the reason they are top of the table.

Hopefully, negotiations crumble and Arsenal can swoop in. Wenger speaks Japanese, surely Fergie cant!!

Billybob.

Agree0 Disagree0

04 Apr 2012 06:07:05
Chamakh told French magazine Onze: 'Am I going back to Bordeaux? For now, no. I have spoken to Wenger and I will stay at Arsenal. I think he trusts my work and I will have opportunities in the first team.
'I left Bordeaux to improve as a player and I think I can continue for this club. My agents have been ordered to reject bids that come from other clubs because I want to prove I can be useful for the Gunners.'

Seriously, is this guy right in the head? Told his agent to reject bids because he can be useful at Arsenal ahahah, really Chamakh?

This is what happens when you overpay rubbish players like AW does....they dont want to leave.

Marty

Believable22 Unbelievable10

The first three months that Chamakh was here, he was a great prospect - he looked like the future. Don't know what has gone wrong since but there is a very good player lurking there somewhere ...

Agree0 Disagree0

I think our style of play doesn't really suit him. we do not operate that much with crosses. and if we do, we hardly do well...

Stefan

Agree0 Disagree0

Its true...Chamakh was pretty good the first 3 months where he was quite influential...so he only lost form towards the end of last season onwards...so I dont know how a manager could have predicted that...a bit harsh and short-sighted to say otherwise
ES

Agree0 Disagree0

When was the last time chamack had 90 minutes with the first team? Last time he was given a run of 10 or 15 games he did well he hasn't since. He may well not be good enough but how do people judge him without him having a run. The media always say he has 1 goal in 17 appearances this year but how often is he brought on in the last 5 minutes? I would prefer to see the goal to minute ratio, I know that is still terrible but Torres managed to turn around things recently as he has been given a chance.
I'm not asking people to like chamack just to give him a chance
Bermy gooner

Agree0 Disagree0

There is a good reason for his demise. its not public knowlege though. he has been here 2 seasons now. thats 18 months worth of football and you talk about being pretty good for 3 months. that to me = failure. Let him go for nothing and get his £60k a week back in the pot. He is not going to be the difference between champs league qualifacation and actually challenging for the league. Zamora would be better use than Chamak.

Agree0 Disagree0

I am usually adverse to player bashing, but just cant believe that he was ever good enough for Arsenal. His career scoring stats are poor for a striker, even in his pre-Arsenal days. That was playing in Ligue 1, so it is no surprise that he has scored very few in the Premier League. I cant really see his stand-out abilities apart from headers and occasionally build-up play. But even Bendtner proves more useful for both of these purposes, so Chamakh was never going to add another dimension. It may be easy to say with hindsight, but I cant see why we even signed him in the first place. And I would usually vote for giving under-performers a chance (always thought this with Ramsey, Eboue, even Denilson) but there is no evidence that Chamakh will ever be able to offer much to the team. Completely agree with above poster, he is just wasting a portion of our wage bill and his own career. Let him go.

Oleg Maputo

Agree0 Disagree0

Chamakh is clearly a quality player, he just hasnt played regularly since RVP returned from injury last season. In our current formation we only play with one out & out striker, usually RVP. Playing players such as Chamakh, Bentner & Arshavin out wide has proved a disaster.

Agree0 Disagree0

Bendnter and arshavin did pretty darn good stat wise being positioned out wide despite especially in bentnters case of playing there.
chamakh is a one trick pony with limited abilities and like any player not featuring on a regular player (he plays for arsenal and not wigan) so chances come more frequently and however freakishly awesome rvp has been of late only scoring 2 goals in over a year and half of football is horrific.
he needed to go last summer and play for a team who plays to his needs (crossing/aerial), its benefited no one him being with us for so long, only thing that has improved is his private life it seems, london is bad for this particular party boy.

Agree0 Disagree0

A think hes good just had limited chances same with bendtner look how hes doing now getting regular games and scoring

Agree0 Disagree0

Oh i seem to have the sniffles.

Agree0 Disagree0

HE COMES ON FOR 15 MINUTES EVERY 5 GAMES! WHAT DO U WANT HIM TO DO! IM NOT SAYING HE'S ANY GOOD BUT YOU CANT KNOCK HIM IF HE AINT GIVEN A FAIR CHANCE. THE ONE TIME HE DID, WHICH IS WHEN HE FIRST CAME HE DID WELL!

Agree0 Disagree0