03 Sep 2020 23:44:49
I would love to know Ed2 and 47s thoughts regarding Adrian Clarke's live. He's employed by Arsenal in some way.

Some excerpts from the interview is --
Dani is effectively a bench player if we get our targets (now that Dani is done almost)
Dani isn't the box to box influence that Ramsey was (Don't know what Ramsey was for us honestly) , Saying clearly Guendouzi is for sale, Disclosing our targets in terms of Partey/ Aouar and how both of them would transform us.

Isn't it a conflict of interest as he is kind of employed by us? Do we want an inside source telling the world we desperate to move on certain players and don't believe in some entirely by giving out their shortcomings?

{Ed047's Note - he does the analysis stuff on the Arsenal club site if we’re talking about the same guy.

I think a lot of what he has said is already out in the public domain re targets etc and people leaving as we ourselves openly talk about in on here for example, however not sure that talking about a potential target (Ceballos) in such a negative way is advisable or particularly sensible.

1.) 04 Sep 2020
04 Sep 2020 13:49:06
Where is the interview as it’s not on aftv yet.

2.) 05 Sep 2020
05 Sep 2020 09:27:37
Thanks Ed47!- Yes it's the same guy.

The interview is on YouTube under - The Chronices of a Gunner channel

Search for- Adrian Clarke on Thomas Partey

Absolutely uncalled for some of that stuff - Especially cause he is being employed by the club.

If I had done that to my current employers - They would have furloughed me for sure.

{Ed047's Note - ah thanks mate, I’ll have a look later when I’ve finished work.

No our owner he’s not even aware of it! 🤣