28 Jun 2013 15:42:51
Guys, not really transfer related, but I have a question for all you gooners:
Emotional attachment aside, from a purely footballing point of view, would you rather have gotze or wilshere in your team?

As is said, hardly relevant, but I just thought it would be interesting to see who people rate more out of these two young talents.

1.) 28 Jun 2013
Emotions aside, at this present time Gotze.
Merely down to Wilsheres' injuries, but if Wilshere has a couple of injury free seasons then you'll probably get a different response.
Flybo

2.) 28 Jun 2013
Still Wilshere. Don't get me wrong, Gotze is an incredible talent. But I think Jack's all round play is better.

I think Jack has more potential, but because of his injury he is not currently better than Gotze.

3.) 28 Jun 2013
Gotze just did a Van Persie on Dortmund, so no chance.
Also and more importantly, Wilshere will be a better, more complete player

Paul

4.) 28 Jun 2013
To different players a better comparison to Goetze would be Isco.

Wilshere is a bit like Gerrard in the way he can put in a hard tackle and win back possession to start and attack.

I'd personally prefer Isco.

5.) 28 Jun 2013
Wilshere, Isco and Gotze mainly operate on the flanks at this early age whereas we put Jack smack in the middle of the pitch and funnel everything through him

Jack has that something of a different class, same thing we saw in Cesc from day one

6.) 28 Jun 2013
I haven't saw much of gotze he sounds amazing but with wilshere possesing fantastic dribbling passion and passing. I prefer Wilshere, at 19 he took on barcelona with iniesta xavi and busquets and came out on top. Once he improves shooting a little bit he will be the best in the prem and carry the England team on his back to glory

Bergkamp5353

ps just to make clear wilshire

7.) 29 Jun 2013
Although they are different players I'd prefer Wilshere as he can dictate the play in the middle of the park and has great composure and drive through the middle. He has more all around to his game than Goetze.