27 Apr 2015 08:56:30
I think a meagre 4 league titles in 110 years is pathetic let alone boring. Puts them level with Sheffield Wednesday, bahahahahahahaha!!

1.) 27 Apr 2015
27 Apr 2015 09:53:33
That did really annoy me when he said that. Clearly he isn't too clued up on Chelsea's history. Honestly he is a great manager but I cannot stand his arrogance.

2.) 27 Apr 2015
27 Apr 2015 09:58:11
Oh come on give them credit - They got exactly what they needed and did exactly what they wanted to do. Arsenal invented winning boring - 1 nil to the Arsenal ring any bells? You'd love to win another title regardless of if it was 'boring' or not. Try to be humble, others on this site are managing it.

{Ed025's Note - well said rosie, spot on mate..

3.) 27 Apr 2015
27 Apr 2015 10:51:11
Rosie I agree with almost you say chelsea are very worthy champions elect and a bit of humidity shouldn't be beyond anyone who hopes to be taken seriously, but personally I'd rather be runners up 100 times watching the invincibles over 38 games than winning a hatrick of titles under George style football ever again, to each thier own I know.

4.) 27 Apr 2015
27 Apr 2015 11:35:46
Agree, G62. As a spectator, you want the spectacle to be as spectacularly entertaining as possible!

5.) 27 Apr 2015
27 Apr 2015 11:46:57
And if you go back to the first half of the season you will see Chelsea getting the results and playing some lovely football. It's easy to forget but they haven't played boring park the bus football all season. It's like a driver in formula one, you give yourself a nice enough lead and then drive safe to make sure the car behind doesn't over take - Liverpool could have done this last year but they didn't and they crashed and burned. Smart football, smart tactics and despite being an unhappy United fan you have to congratulate Chelsea.

{Ed025's Note - im with you rosie..

6.) 28 Apr 2015
28 Apr 2015 22:54:03
RedRosie. The point was not about getting results or how teams play, it was about 4 titles to 14 and the audacity the classless portuguese man had to even mention the history of Arsenal when he manages a small club with no history and a corrupt owner billionaire. I remember the 1-0 to the Arsenal days very well darling, thanks for the patronising reminder and if you'd actually followed Arsenal around the country and gone to as many matches as I did, you'd know how much attractive football we did play during that time and how many spankings we handed out. There's obviously F all of interest going on at your club if you feel the need to come on to the Arsenal page and make out your some kind of authority on football. Now do one back to your non-mancunian bunch and leave us to debate OUR team. This is not a free for all site, that's why we have our own pages

{Ed025's Note - i dont get that WG, if rosie was being abusive or nasty then i could understand your point, but it was a valid argument and other posters are welcome on this and every other teams pages im afraid, G62 and dags often visit other pages and post so i dont see why you object to outsiders having their say, you dont have to agree with them and you can ignore their posts if you like mate, but exclusivity is not happening..