30 Mar 2015 14:06:24
Theo walcott plus anything under £15m for Raheem Sterling is a no brainier imo

1.) 30 Mar 2015
30 Mar 2015 14:40:42
would cost more i think. if not then bargain

2.) 30 Mar 2015
30 Mar 2015 14:43:16
We are not going to pay 160 000 per week to Sterling anytime soon, so not getting hopes up on this one.

3.) 30 Mar 2015
30 Mar 2015 15:30:58
And nor should we Roster mate and anyone who is happy to pay him that deserves all they get one way or another from him.
As for Theo, take the deal on the table say thank you and set about repaying the club for letting you stay.

4.) 30 Mar 2015
30 Mar 2015 15:59:25
sterling for me will end up on that wage and will become a top top player

5.) 30 Mar 2015
30 Mar 2015 17:03:17
Agree derby, I really think sterling will be a top top player in a few years, and I think these immense wage demands the papers are claiming are actually false and he is trying to push a move to a team that will be playing in champions league and have a chance at actually winning the title. Whether that be England or abroad 120k per week should be enough to convince him, convincing Liverpool on the other hand that's the tough bit

6.) 30 Mar 2015
30 Mar 2015 17:10:58
For me bill . I think it's both. More money he's worth same as Sturridge I feel and to join a club to challange year in year out. Not saying sturridge is worth that wage but its only fair on sterling. He's got to keep playing champions league football he's tll good not to be

7.) 30 Mar 2015
30 Mar 2015 18:04:28
Still prefer Theo.

I think all the Sterling talk will give Theo a rocket up the pelican and he will play better.

8.) 30 Mar 2015
30 Mar 2015 19:03:34
Pelican?

Hehe love it.